Original Research ArticleThe effects of CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care on postpartum visit attendance and contraception use☆,☆☆
Introduction
Comprehensive postpartum care, including family planning, is a critical preventive health service that promotes optimal health for mother and infant [1]. Yet, as many as 40–50% of women do not attend a postpartum visit 4–6 weeks after birth despite current guidelines [2]. Low attendance rates are particularly common among women with limited resources, including those with Medicaid [3], [4], [5]. This lack of engagement with postpartum care risks delay in addressing peri- and postnatal health issues, missed opportunities for identifying problems with the physical and mental adjustments to motherhood, and planning for the healthy timing and spacing of future pregnancies [6], [7]. Acknowledging the historical context of fertility control and sterilization abuse, current best practice guidelines emphasize that each woman receive information on the full range of contraception options so she can make a well-informed, individualized choice [2], [8]. The importance of measuring patient engagement around these two metrics – postpartum visit attendance and contraceptive use – has been recognized by the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) and the Office of Population Affairs who have each developed clinical performance measures to support quality improvement efforts aimed at increasing utilization of these services [9], [10].
The CenteringPregnancy® model of group prenatal care addresses the topics of family planning and postpartum care explicitly and in greater detail compared with traditional, individual prenatal care [11]. Medical providers deliver educational content through facilitating group discussion, which fosters patient engagement and encourages women to ask questions. This model has overall demonstrated positive outcomes, including higher rates of prenatal care use and satisfaction, improvements in preterm birth rates, and higher rates of breastfeeding [12], [13], [14], [15]. One of the curriculum development goals was to optimize care and support for women in the postpartum period and address postpartum contraceptive methods [16]. Several smaller observational studies have noted that group participants have higher rates of postpartum visit attendance, are more likely to utilize contraceptive care visits, and are more likely to choose long-acting, reversible contraception (LARC) [17], [18], [19].
Larger studies with standardized measures and more rigorous approaches to addressing selection bias are needed to understand CenteringPregnancy’s impact on these metrics. We investigate this research gap through comparing these standardized quality of care measures using Medicaid claims in the context of an 18-site state-supported expansion of CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care.
Section snippets
Objectives
This study had two main objectives: to explore whether Medicaid-enrolled women receiving group compared to individual prenatal care had (1) higher rates of postpartum visit attendance and (2) were more likely to access contraceptives in the postpartum period, and in particular, select long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods. We define LARC methods as intrauterine devices and implants.
Group prenatal care
The CenteringPregnancy model of group prenatal care, developed and maintained by the Centering
Population characteristics
CenteringPregnancy (N = 2834) and individual care (N = 13,088) participants differed across demographic characteristics and adequacy of prenatal care (Table 1). Of note, group participants were younger, had lower levels of educational attainment, and were more likely to be Hispanic. This group also had a higher percentage of first-time mothers and began prenatal care earlier. Both groups also differed across risk factors for poor birth outcomes. Group participants were less likely to have a BMI
Discussion
Group prenatal care participation is associated with greater rates of postpartum visit attendance for women who attend at least five prenatal care visits. The additional patient engagement and education in the group setting may positively impact some women’s decisions to seek postpartum care, but not be sufficient to support low-income women overcoming other barriers to accessing care such as insufficient care continuity, lack of social support, childcare and transportation issues, and language
References (38)
- et al.
Pregnancy outcomes of adolescents enrolled in a CenteringPregnancy program
J Midwifery Womens Health
(2004) Centering Pregnancy: an interdisciplinary model of empowerment
J Nurse Midwifery
(1998)- et al.
The effect of centering pregnancy versus traditional prenatal care models on improved adolescent health behaviors in the perinatal period
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol
(2015) - et al.
Investing in CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care reduces newborn hospitalization costs
Women’s Heal Issues
(2017) - et al.
The impact of Centering Pregnancy Group Prenatal Care on postpartum family planning
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2014) - et al.
Trends and disparities in postpartum sterilization after cesarean section, 2000 through 2008
Women’s Heal Issues
(2015) - et al.
Contraceptive method use in the United States: trends and characteristics between 2008, 2012 and 2014
Contraception
(2018) - et al.
“I don’t know enough to feel comfortable using them”: women’s knowledge of and perceived barriers to long-acting reversible contraceptives on a college campus
Contraception
(2016) - et al.
Patients’ experiences with South Carolina’s immediate postpartum Long-acting reversible contraception Medicaid policy
Contraception
(2019) - et al.
Policy change is not enough: engaging provider champions on immediate postpartum contraception
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2018)
Understanding factors associated with postpartum visit attendance and contraception choices: Listening to low-income postpartum women and health care providers
Matern Child Heal J
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 736: optimizing postpartum care
Obstet Gynecol
Utilization of primary and obstetric care after medically complicated pregnancies: an analysis of medical claims data
JGIM J Gen Intern Med
Predictors of compliance with the postpartum visit among women living in healthy start project areas
Matern Child Heal J
Is Effective contraceptive use conceived prenatally in Florida? The association between prenatal contraceptive counseling and postpartum contraceptive use
Matern Child Heal J
Contraception after delivery and short interpregnancy intervals among women in the United States
Obstet Gynecol
Effects of birth spacing on maternal, perinatal, infant, and child health: a systematic review of causal mechanisms
Stud Fam Plann
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 695: sterilization of women: ethical issues and considerations
Obstet Gynecol
Cited by (12)
Contributions of CenteringPregnancy to women's health behaviours, health literacy, and health care use in the Netherlands
2023, Preventive Medicine ReportsWell Child Visit Attendance for Group Prenatal Care Participants
2023, Academic PediatricsGroup vs traditional prenatal care for improving racial equity in preterm birth and low birthweight: the Centering and Racial Disparities randomized clinical trial study
2022, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyCitation Excerpt :Second, the per-compliance (PC) sample included participants with ≥5 sessions or visits in their assigned treatment arm (GPNC and IPNC) and excluded participants who crossed over from IPNC to GPNC. This 5-visit threshold was based on previously published studies, which have also used this threshold as an indicator of adequate exposure to the GPNC treatment.2,29,30,32,42,43 Because the mITT and PC samples no longer represented a randomized pool of participants because of exclusions, we additionally adjusted for the baseline variables that were significantly different (P<.01) between care models in each sample at baseline.
Randomized control trial of postpartum visits at 2 and 6 weeks
2021, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology MFMCitation Excerpt :The average postpartum visit rate varies nationwide between 60% and 90% and is lower among minority groups, younger women, women with higher parity, and women with limited prenatal care.3,4 Several interventions have been studied in an attempt to increase postpartum visit attendance, which include offering incentives, home visits, group prenatal care, and scheduling the visit on hospital discharge.5,6 Moreover, there are various guidelines for the timing and frequency of postpartum visits that vary globally from 48 hours to 8 weeks after delivery.
- ☆
Declaration of interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
- ☆☆
Funding sources: South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and the South Carolina Chapter of the March of Dimes supported the state-wide expansion of CenteringPregnancy and the evaluation.
- 1
Present address for Dr. Willis: Georgia Department of Community Health, 2 Peachtree Street, NW, Atlanta, GA 30303, United States.